重复经颅磁刺激治疗缺血性脑卒中后 认知功能障碍的疗效观察
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

王国胜,男,主治医师,主要研究方向是神经系统疾病康复基础与临床。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 743.3

基金项目:

河南省医学科技攻关计划(联合共建)项目(LHGJ20190431)


Observation on the Therapeutic Effect of Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognitive Dysfunction after Ischemic Stroke
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要目的:探究缺血性脑卒中后认知功能障碍干预中重复经颅磁刺激治疗的效果。 方法:回顾性选取 2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 6 月郑州大学第五附属医院收治的 60 例缺血性脑卒中后认知功能障碍患者,依据干预方法的 不同分为常规性认知康复训练组、重复经颅磁刺激治疗组两组,各 30 例。常规性认知康复训练组进行认知康复训练, 重复经颅磁刺激治疗组在认知康复训练基础上进行重复经颅磁刺激治疗。比较两组患者认知功能、神经功能、生存 质量、临床疗效、不良反应发生情况。 结果:干预后,重复经颅磁刺激治疗组患者蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA) 评分、认知评定量表(CRS)评分、脑卒中专门化生存质量量表(SS–QOL)各项评分及总分均高于常规性认知康复 训练组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。干预后,重复经颅磁刺激治疗组患者美国国立卫生研究院脑卒中量表 (NIHSS)评分低于常规性认知康复训练组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。重复经颅磁刺激治疗组患者临床总 有效率高于常规性认知康复训练组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计 学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论:缺血性脑卒中后认知功能障碍干预中认知康复训练基础上联合重复经颅磁刺激治疗的效 果较单独应用认知康复训练显著。

    Abstract:

    AbstractObjective To explore the efficacy of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in cognitive dysfunction intervention after ischemic stroke. Methods A retrospective selection was conducted on 60 patients with cognitive dysfunction after ischemic stroke admitted to the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from July 2022 to June 2023. According to different intervention methods, they were divided into two groups, conventional cognitive rehabilitation training group and repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment group, with 30 cases in each group. The conventional cognitive rehabilitation training group received cognitive rehabilitation training, while the repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment group received repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment on the basis of cognitive rehabilitation training. The cognitive function, neurological function, quality of life, clinical efficacy and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results After intervention, the scores of Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA), cognitive rating scale (CRS), and the stroke specific quality of life scale (SS-QOL) and the total scores of patients in the repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment group were higher than those in the conventional cognitive rehabilitation training group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). After intervention, the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score of patients in the repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment group was lower than that in the conventional cognitive rehabilitation training group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The total clinical effective rate of patients in the repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment group was higher than that in the conventional cognitive rehabilitation training group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the intervention of cognitive dysfunction after ischemic stroke, the combination of cognitive rehabilitation training and repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment has a significant therapeutic effect compared to the use of cognitive rehabilitation training alone.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-16
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-08-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭