基于营养风险筛查应用不同方式营养干预 对胃肠肿瘤患者的效果研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

屈甜甜,女,主管药师,主要研究方向是肠外营养。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 735.3

基金项目:

南阳市科技计划项目(KJGG020)


Effect of Different Nutritional Interventions Based on Nutritional Risk Screening on Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要目的:基于营养风险筛查 2002(NRS2002)筛查结果探讨晚期胃肠道肿瘤患者接受不同方式营养干预 的可行性及有效性。 方法:选取南阳市第二人民医院肿瘤科 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 5 月收治的 228 例胃肠道肿瘤晚期 (不可手术切除)患者为研究对象,由经过营养科培训的护士每日应用NRS2002进行营养风险筛查,确定存在营养风险。 按照临床医生治疗情况及患者意愿决定营养支持方式,将有营养风险的胃肠道肿瘤患者分成对照组(单瓶肠外营养治 疗)、观察组 A(“ 全合一 ” 肠外营养治疗)、观察组 B(肠内营养治疗),评估不同营养支持方式患者的焦虑、抑 郁、生活质量评分、不良反应发生情况和治疗前后营养相关的化验指标的变化。 结果:干预后,观察组 A 和观察组 B 两组患者的焦虑自我评价量表(SAS)、抑郁自我评价量表(SDS)、健康相关生命质量评分量表(HRQOL)评分 均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);观察组 B 患者便秘和腹胀的情况高于对照组,感染情况低于对照 组与观察组 A,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);干预后观察组 A 和观察组 B 两组患者的血清转铁蛋白(TRF)、 白蛋白(ALB)、前白蛋白(PA)水平显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论:营养支持治疗在 改善患者营养指标方面有着积极的意义,尤其是采用肠内营养和 “ 全合一 ” 肠外营养治疗方式的患者。但无论何种营 养支持方式均不能极大地改变患者疾病的发展整体形势。

    Abstract:

    AbstractObjective Based on the results of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002), the feasibility and effectiveness of different nutritional interventions in patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors were investigated. Methods A total of 228 patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors (inoperable) admitted to the Oncology Department of Nanyang Second People's Hospital from June 2022 to May 2023 were selected as the study objects. Nurses trained in the nutrition department applied NRS2002 daily for nutritional risk screening to determine the presence of nutritional risk. According to the treatment conditions of clinicians and patients' wishes, nutritional support methods were determined. Patients with gastrointestinal tumors with nutritional risks were divided into control group (single bottle parenteral nutrition treatment), observation group A ("all-in-one" parenteral nutrition treatment) and observation group B (enteral nutrition treatment). The changes of anxiety, depression, quality of life scores, adverse reactions and nutrition-related laboratory indicators before and after treatment were evaluated in patients with different nutritional support methods. Results After intervention, the scores of self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Observation Group A and Observation Group B were lower than those in control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The constipation and abdominal distension of observation group B was higher than that of control group, and the infection was lower than that of control group and observation group A, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After intervention, the levels of serum transferrin (TRF), albumin (ALB) and prealbumin (PA) in observation groups A and B were significantly higher than those in control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion Nutritional support therapy has a positive significance in improving the nutritional indexes of patients, especially in patients who adopt enteral nutrition and "allin-one" parenteral nutrition therapy. However, no matter what kind of nutritional support can not greatly change the overall situation of disease development of patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-08-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭