DOR 患者 IVF–ET 周期中应用微刺激方案和 PPOS 方案的临床疗效比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

陈瑜,女,副主任医师,主要研究方向是生殖医学。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 711.75

基金项目:


Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between Microstimulation Scheme and PPOS Scheme in IVF-ET Cycle of Patients with DOR
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要目的:探究卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)患者体外受精(IVF)– 胚胎移植(ET)周期中应用微刺激方案和高 孕激素状态下促排卵(PPOS)方案的临床疗效。 方法:选取 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月于徐州市妇幼保健院生殖中心行 IVF–ET治疗的72例DOR患者作为研究对象,回顾性分析其临床资料,根据其不同促排卵方案分为观察组与对照组,各36例。 观察组患者采用 PPOS 方案促排卵,对照组患者采用微刺激方案促排卵。观察两组患者促排卵情况、人绒毛膜促性腺激素 (HCG)注射日血清性激素水平、临床妊娠结局。 结果:观察组患者促性腺激素(Gn)使用量、获卵数、可利用胚胎数多 于对照组,Gn 使用时间长于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组患者 HCG 注射日血清雌二醇(E2)、孕 酮(P)、黄体生成素(LH)水平均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组患者临床妊娠率高于对照组, 周期取消率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者早期流产率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论:PPOS 方案是一种可行且有效的促排卵方案,在 DOR 患者 IVF–ET 周期中应用 PPOS 方案可争取更多的妊娠机会, 获得比较满意的临床妊娠结局,为 DOR 患者促排卵提供新的选择方案。

    Abstract:

    AbstractObjective To explore the clinical efficacy of microstimulation and progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) -embryo transfer (ET) cycle in patients with diminished ova-rian reserve (DOR). Methods A total of 72 patients with DOR who underwent IVF-ET treatment in the reproductive center of Xuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects. Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into an observation group and a control group according to different ovulation promotion schemes, with 36 cases in each group. The patients in the observation group received PPOS scheme and the control group received microstimulation scheme. Ovulation induction, serum sex hormone level on human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) injection day and clinical pregnancy outcome were observed in the two groups. Results The consumption of gonadotropin (Gn), the number of eggs harvested and the number of available embryos in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the use time of Gn was longer than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The levels of serum estradiol (E2), progesterone (P) and luteinizing hormone (LH) on HCG injection day in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the cycle cancellation rate was lower than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the early abortion rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion PPOS scheme is a feasible and effective ovulation induction scheme. The application of PPOS scheme in the IVF-ET cycle of patients with DOR can strive for more pregnancy opportunities and obtain satisfactory clinical pregnancy outcome, which provides a new choice for ovulation induction in patients with DOR.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-11
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-02-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭