岭南火针联合加巴喷丁胶囊治疗 带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

刘琨,女,主治中医师,主要研究方向是针灸治疗神经系统疾病及疼痛性疾病的临床和机制。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 752.1+ 2

基金项目:


Clinical Efficacy of Lingnan Fire Needle Combined with Gabapentin Capsules in the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要目的:观察岭南火针联合加巴喷丁胶囊治疗带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)的有效性和安全性。 方法:选取 2019年4月至2020年4月在广州中医药大学第一附属医院针灸科门诊和住院部就诊的PHN患者共67例,采用随机数字表法, 随机分配至观察组和对照组,观察组 31 例,对照组 36 例。对照组患者仅以加巴喷丁胶囊治疗,观察组患者采用火针联合 加巴喷丁胶囊治疗。比较两组患者临床疗效。 结果:观察组治疗第 5 天视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分低于对照组,且 VAS 评分下降≥ 30 %、VAS 评分下降≥ 50 % 天数均短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);观察组患者治疗总有效 率为 90.32 %,高于对照组的 80.56 %,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组患者在第 5 天、第 11 天的疼痛面积及利兹 神经病理性症状和体征疼痛评分(LANSS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);观察组患者在第 5 天的 ID Pain 低 于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);但在第 11 天的 ID Pain 评分比较,两组患者差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05); 观察组患者加巴喷丁总药量为 10500(10200,12000)mg,低于对照组的 11700(10200,12300)mg,差异具有统计学意义 (P < 0.05);观察组患者不良反应发生率为 22.60 %,低于对照组的 63.90 %,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);观察组 患者第 5 天生理职能(RP)、躯体疼痛(BP)、社会功能(SF)、情感职能(RE)评分均高于对照组患者,差异具有统 计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论:岭南火针干预明显缩短 PHN 疼痛缓解时间,短期内改善症状,缩短治疗时间成本,提高生 活质量的同时,增加安全性。

    Abstract:

    AbstractObjective To observe the efficacy and safety of Lingnan fire needle combined with gabapentin capsule in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Methods A total of 67 PHN patients treated in the outpatient and inpatient department of Acupuncture and moxibustion Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine from April 2019 to April 2020 were selected and randomly assigned to an observation group and a control group by random number table method, with 31 cases in the observation group and 36 cases in the control group. The control group was treated with gabapentin capsule only, and the observation group was treated with fire needle combined with gabapentin capsule. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results The visual analogue scale (VAS) score on the 5th day of treatment in the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the days of VAS score decline ≥ 30% and VAS score decline ≥ 50% were shorter than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The total effective rate of the observation group was 90.32 %, higher than 80.56 % of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pain area and the leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and sign (LANSS) score between the two groups on the 5th and 11th day (P > 0.05). The ID Pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group on 5th day, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); However, there was no significant difference in ID Pain score between the two groups on the 11th day (P > 0.05). The total dose of gabapentin in the observation group was 10500 (10200,12000) mg, which was lower than 11700 (10200,12300) mg in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 22.60 %, lower than that in the control group (63.90%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The scores of role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF) and role emotional (RE) in the observation group were higher than those in the control group on 5th day, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion Lingnan fire needle intervention can significantly shorten the time of pain relief for PHN, improve symptoms in the short term, shorten the cost of treatment time, improve the quality of life and increase safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-15
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-02-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭