阿卡波糖和二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

张明芳,女,主管药师,主要研究方向是临床药学。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 587.1

基金项目:


Analysis of the Efficacy of Acarbose and Metformin in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要目的:分析阿卡波糖和二甲双胍对 2 型糖尿病的治疗效果。 方法:回顾性选取 2018 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月期 间三明市第一医院三钢分院收治的 82 例 2 型糖尿病患者作为研究对象。根据用药方法不同分为对照组和观察组,各 41 例。 对照组采用阿卡波糖治疗,观察组采用二甲双胍治疗。治疗 1 个疗程后,比较两组患者治疗前后血糖指标、血脂指标,统 计两组患者治疗期间不良反应。 结果:治疗后,观察组患者空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白水平、胰岛素抵抗指数均低于对照组, 餐后 2 h 血糖高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后,观察组患者三酰甘油、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白水 平均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论:阿卡波糖与二甲双胍对于 2 型糖尿病的起效机制不同,治疗侧重方向也会有所不同,二甲双胍更适用于合并肥胖、 血脂偏高、胰岛素抵抗的 2 型糖尿病患者治疗,而阿卡波糖更适用于餐后血糖较高的患者治疗。

    Abstract:

    AbstractObjective To analyze the therapeutic effect of acarbose and metformin on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods 82 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted to the Sanming First Hospital of Sangang Branch from July 2018 to June 2022 were retrospectively selected as the study subjects. According to different medication methods, they were divided into a control group and an observation group, with 41 cases in each group. The control group was treated with acarbose, and the observation group was treated with metformin. After one course of treatment, compare the blood glucose and lipid indicators of the two groups of patients before and after treatment, and calculate the adverse reactions of the two groups of patients during the treatment period. Results After treatment, the levels of fasting blood glucose, and glycated hemoglobin, and insulin resistance index of patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the levels of blood glucose 2 hours after meal was higher than that in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of triacylglycerol, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). Conclusion The mechanism of action of acarbose and metformin for type 2 diabetes mellitus is different, and the focus of treatment will also be different. Metformin is more suitable for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with obesity, high blood lipids, and insulin resistance, while acarbose is more suitable for patients with high postprandial blood glucose.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-08-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭