高危型 HPV–DNA 分型联合 TCT 及阴道镜 检查在宫颈癌前病变早期筛查中的价值
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1.中山大学附属第一医院惠亚医院,广东 惠州 516000)

作者简介:

邹华兰,女,主治医师,主要研究方向是宫颈病变。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 737.33

基金项目:


Value of High-risk HPV-DNA Typing Combined with TCT and Colposcopy in the Early Screening of Cervical Precancerous Lesions
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Huiya Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Huizhou 516000)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要目的:探讨高危型人乳头状瘤病毒(HPV)脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)分型联合薄层液基细胞检查(TCT) 及阴道镜检查在宫颈癌前病变早期筛查中的临床价值。方法:回顾性分析 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月中山大学附属 第一医院惠亚医院收入的宫颈癌前病变患者 100 例,以及慢性宫颈炎患者 60 例,对两组患者均进行高危型 HPV– DNA 分型、TCT 以及阴道镜检查,以病理检查结果作为金标准,分析高危型 HPV–DNA 分型检测、TCT 以及阴道镜 检查三种检查方案单项以及联合检测的诊断效能,并比较差异。结果:高危型 HPV–DNA 分型+ TCT +阴道镜诊断 宫颈癌前病变的灵敏度为 98.00 %(98/100),特异度为 38.33 %(23/60),准确率为 75.62 %(121/160);高危型 HPV–DNA 分型+ TCT +阴道镜灵敏度高于高危型 HPV–DNA 分型、TCT、阴道镜单项检查;TCT +阴道镜、高危 型 HPV–DNA 分型+阴道镜、高危型 HPV–DNA 分型+ TCT、阴道镜、高危型 HPV–DNA 分型灵敏度均高于 TCT 单 项检查;高危型 HPV–DNA 分型+阴道镜、高危型 HPV–DNA 分型+ TCT 灵敏度均高于阴道镜检查,差异均具有统 计学意义(P < 0.05);高危型 HPV–DNA 分型+ TCT +阴道镜、TCT +阴道镜、高危型 HPV–DNA 分型+阴道镜、 高危型 HPV–DNA 分型+ TCT、阴道镜、高危型 HPV–DNA 分型准确度高于 TCT 单项检查,差异均具有统计学意义 (P < 0.05);而其他检查方案间的准确度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05);不同检查方案间特异度、 阳性预测值及阴性预测值比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:宫颈癌前病变早期筛查中应用高危型 HPV–DNA 分型、TCT、阴道镜检查三者联合检查,相较于单项检查可显著提高灵敏度,减少漏诊情况。

    Abstract:

    AbstractObjective To explore the clinical value of high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) typing combined with thinprep cytologic test (TCT) and colposcopy in the early screening of cervical precancerous lesions. Methods Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from January 2019 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, and both groups of patients were examined by high-risk HPV-DNA typing, TCT and colposcopy. The pathological examination was used as the gold standard to analyze the diagnostic efficiency of high-risk HPV-DNA typing, TCT and colposcopy and the combination detection, and the differences were compared. Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of high-risk HPV-DNA typing + TCT + colposcopy in the diagnosis of cervical precancerous lesions were 98.00 % (98/100), 38.33 % (23/60) and 75.62 % (121/160) respectively; The sensitivity of high-risk HPV-DNA typing + TCT + colposcopy were higher than those of high-risk HPV-DNA typing, TCT and colposcopy. The sensitivity of TCT + colposcopy, high risk HPV-DNA typing + colposcopy, high risk HPV-DNA typing + TCT, colposcopy, high risk HPV-DNA typing sensitivity were higher than those of TCT single test; The sensitivity of high risk HPV-DNA typing + colposcopy and high risk HPV-DNA typing +TCT were higher than those of colposcopy, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The accuracy of high risk HPV-DNA typing + TCT + colposcopy, TCT + colposcopy, high risk HPV-DNA typing + colposcopy, high risk HPV-DNA typing +TCT, colposcopy, high risk HPV-DNA typing were higher than those of TCT single examination, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the accuracy of other test schemes (P > 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value among different test schemes (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the early screening of cervical precancerous lesions, the combined examination of high-risk HPV-DNA typing, TCT and colposcopy can significantly improve the sensitivity and reduce the missed diagnosis compared with the single examination.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-21
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-05-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭