血液检验技术在贫血诊断与鉴别中的应用价值
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(三明市第一医院,福建 三明 365000)

作者简介:

吴秀珍,女,主管技师,主要研究方向是临床基础检验技术。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 556;R 446.11

基金项目:


Application Value of Blood Test in the Diagnosis and Differentiation of Anemia
Author:
Affiliation:

(Sanming First Hospital, Fujian Sanming 365000)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    〔摘 要〕 目的:探讨在贫血诊断中采用血液检验技术的价值。方法:随机选取 173 例自 2020 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月 在三明市第一医院进行诊治的贫血患者,包括缺铁性贫血患者 84 例、地中海贫血患者 89 例,并按贫血严重程度分为 轻度贫血患者 116 例、中度贫血患者 37 例、重度贫血患者 20 例,另随机选取 71 例同期接受体检的健康者,应用血 液检验技术进行疾病诊断和鉴别,比较缺铁性贫血、地中海贫血患者与健康者之间以及不同贫血程度患者之间的平均 血红蛋白量(MCH)、平均血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)、红细胞体积分布宽度(RDW)、红细胞平均体积(MCV)、 血红蛋白浓度(Hb)、红细胞计数(RBC)及血清铁蛋白(SF)检测结果,并计算血液检验诊断地中海贫血及缺铁 性贫血的效能。结果:地中海贫血、缺铁性贫血患者的 MCH、MCHC、MCV、Hb、RBC 及 SF 水平均低于健康者, RDW 水平均高于健康者;地中海贫血患者 MCH、MCHC、Hb、RBC 及 SF 水平均高于缺铁性贫血患者,RDW、 MCV 均低于缺铁性贫血患者,差异均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。血液检验对地中海贫血与缺铁性贫血的诊断灵 敏度为 96.53 %,特异度为 90.28 %,准确度为 95.08 %。中、重度贫血患者的 MCH、MCHC、MCV、Hb、RBC 及 SF 水平均低于轻度贫血患者,RDW 水平高于轻度贫血患者;重度贫血患者的 MCH、MCHC、MCV、Hb、RBC 及 SF 水平均较中度贫血患者低,RDW 水平较中度贫血患者高,差异均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:血液检验 技术有助于鉴别地中海贫血与缺铁性贫血,还可为临床评估贫血严重程度提供指导。

    Abstract:

    〔Abstract〕 Objective To explore the value of blood test in the diagnosis of anemia. Methods A total of 173 patients with anemia who were treated in Sanming First Hospital from June 2020 to June 2022 were randomly selected, including 84 patients with iron deficiency anemia and 89 patients with thalassemia. According to the severity of anemia, they were divided into 116 patients with mild anemia, 37 patients with moderate anemia and 20 patients with severe anemia. Another 71 healthy subjects who received physical examination at the same time were randomly selected for disease diagnosis and differentiation using blood test technology. Comparison between iron deficiency anemia, the thalassemia patients and healthy subjects and patients with different degree of anemia of the average amount of mean corpsular hemoglobin (MCH), mean hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), red blood cell volume distribution width (RDW), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), concentration of hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell count (RBC) and serum ferritin (SF), and the efficacy of blood test in diagnosing thalassemia and iron deficiency anaemia was calculated. Results The levels of MCH, MCHC, MCV, Hb, RBC and SF in patients with thalassemia and iron deficiency anemia were lower than those in healthy subjects, and the level of RDW was higher than that in healthy subjects. The levels of MCH, MCHC, Hb, RBC and SF in patients with thalassemia were higher than those in patients with iron deficiency anemia, while the levels of RDW and MCV were lower than those in patients with iron deficiency anemia, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of blood test for thalassemia and iron deficiency anemia were 96.53 %, 90.28 % and 95.08 %, respectively. The levels of MCH, MCHC, MCV, Hb, RBC and SF in patients with moderate and severe anemia were lower than those in patients with mild anemia, and the level of RDW was higher than that in patients with mild anemia. The levels of MCH, MCHC, MCV, Hb, RBC and SF in patients with severe anemia were lower than those in patients with moderate anemia, and the level of RDW was higher than that in patients with moderate anemia, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Blood test technology is helpful to differentiate thalassemia from iron deficiency anemia, and can also provide guidance for clinical assessment of anemia severity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-14
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-01-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭