经胸锁乳突肌肌间入路甲状腺切除术与经颈 白线入路切除术治疗甲状腺肿瘤的效果
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(厦门市中医院,福建 厦门 361000)

作者简介:

何圳辉,男,住院医师,主要研究方向是临床医学。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 736.1

基金项目:


Effect of Thyroidectomy with Sternocleidomastoid Intermuscular Approach Transcervical and Linea Alba Cervicalis Approach in the Treatment of Thyroid Tumors
Author:
Affiliation:

(Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fujian Xiamen 361000)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    〔摘 要〕 目的:比较经胸锁乳突肌肌间入路(SMIA)甲状腺切除术与经颈白线入路(LACA)切除术治疗甲状 腺肿瘤(TT)患者的效果。方法:选取厦门市中医院 2018 年 6 月至 2021 年 6 月期间收治的 90 例 TT 患者,按手 术方案不同分成 SMIA 组与 LACA 组,各 45 例。LACA 组患者接受 LACA 甲状腺切除术治疗,SMIA 组患者接受 SMIA 甲状腺切除术治疗。比较两组患者围手术期指标、并发症发生率、术后疼痛评分、美观度评分、手术前后创伤 定量指标、免疫功能指标。结果:SMIA 组患者的切口长度、手术及住院时长均较 LACA 组短,术中失血量较 LACA 组少,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后 6 h、12 h、1 d、3 d,SMIA 组患者的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分 较 LACA 组低,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后 1 个月、3 个月、6 个月,SMIA 组患者的温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS) 评分较 LACA 组低,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后 1 d、3 d,两组患者的血清白细胞介素 –6(IL–6)、 去甲肾上腺素(NE)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)、促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)水平均较术前升高,差异具有统计学意义 (P < 0.05),且术后 1 d、3 d,SMIA 组患者的 IL–6、NE、CRP、ACTH 较 LACA 组低,差异具有统计学意义 (P < 0.05)。术后 1 d、3 d,两组患者的 CD3+、CD4+、CD4+ /CD8+ 水平均较术前降低,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05), 且 SMIA 组患者的 CD3+、CD4+、CD4+ /CD8+ 较 LACA 组高,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。SMIA 组患者的并 发症总发生率为 4.44 %,较 LACA 组的 20.00 % 低,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:相较于 LACA 甲状 腺切除术治疗 TT 患者,应用 SMIA 甲状腺切除术治疗在优化围手术期指标、减轻术后疼痛感、减少并发症、提升瘢 痕美观度方面更具优势,且对机体创伤应激反应、免疫功能影响更小。

    Abstract:

    〔Abstract〕 Objective To compare the efficacy of sternocleidomastoid intermuscular approach (SMIA) thyroidectomy and linea alba cervicalis approach (LACA) thyroidectomy in patients with thyroid tumor (TT). Methods A total of 90 TT patients admitted to Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2018 to June 2021 were selected and divided into SMIA group and LACA group, with 45 cases in each group according to different surgical plans. Patients in the LACA group received LACA thyroidectomy, and patients in the SMIA group received SMIA thyroidectomy. Perioperative indexes, incidence of complications, postoperative pain score, aesthetics score, quantitative indexes of trauma before and after surgery, and immune function indexes of the two groups were compared. Results The incision length, operation duration and hospital stay in the SMIA group were shorter than those in the LACA group, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the LACA group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). At 6 h, 12 h, 1 d and 3 d after surgery, visual analog scale (VAS) score in the SMIA group was lower than that in the LACA group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery, the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) score in the SMIA group was lower than that in the LACA group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). On day 1 and 3 after surgery, the levels of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), norepinephrine (NE), C-reactive protein (CRP) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) in the two groups were increased compared with those before surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The IL-6, NE, CRP and ACTH in the SMIA group were lower than those in the LACA group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). On day 1 and 3 after surgery, the levels of CD3+ , CD4+ and CD4+ /CD8+ in the two groups were lower than those before surgery, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05), and CD3+ , CD4+ and CD4+ /CD8+ in the SMIA group were higher than those in the LACA group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The total incidence of complications in the SMIA group was 4.44%, lower than 20.00% in the LACA group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with LACA thyroidectomy for TT patients, SMIA thyroidectomy has more advantages in optimizing perioperative indicators, alleviating postoperative pain, reducing complications and improving scar aesthetics, and has less impact on the body's traumatic stress response and immune function.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭