基于最佳证据的胸腔积液患者胸腔闭式 引流干预方法及其效果评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(安阳地区医院,河南 安阳 455000)

作者简介:

冯丹,女,护师,主要研究方向是心胸外科护理。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 473.5;R 561.3

基金项目:

河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(2018020882)


Intervention Method and Effect Evaluation of Closed Thoracic Drainage in Patients with Pleural Effusion Based on the Best Evidence
Author:
Affiliation:

(Anyang District Hospital, Henan Anyang 455000)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    〔摘 要〕 目的:基于最佳证据寻找胸腔积液患者胸腔闭式引流干预方法,并探究此法在引流护理中的实际效果。 方法:选取安阳地区医院 2018 年 2 月至 2020 年 10 月收治的 88 例行胸腔闭式引流术的胸腔积液患者,采用随机数 字表法分成常规组和干预组,各 44 例,常规组实施常规护理,干预组实施基于最佳证据得出的系统护理干预,根据 PIPOST 模型确定护理干预相关的循证问题及检索策略,建立研究小组,检索国内外临床实践指南平台相关数据库, 提取胸腔闭式引流在管道护理、心理疏导、应急处理、功能锻炼、专业培训及健康宣教等方面的最佳证据,形成系统 护理干预。比较两组患者的引流时间、日均引流量、平均住院时长、并发症及护理前后的生理功能、疼痛感受、心理 状态、社会功能评分。结果:干预组日均引流量、平均住院时长少于常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);干 预组胸腔积液引流术后并发症总体发生率低于常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);干预组护理后的生活质量 各评分均高于常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:基于最佳证据的胸腔积液患者胸腔闭式引流治疗的 系统护理干预可降低引流后并发症发生率,缓解患者不良情绪,提升生活质量,改善预后。

    Abstract:

    〔Abstract〕 Objective Based on the best evidence to find the intervention method of closed thoracic drainage for patients with pleural effusion, and the actual effect of this method in drainage nursing was explored. MethodsA total of 88 pleural effusion patients undergoing closed thoracic drainage in Anyang District Hospital from February 2018 to October 2020 were selected and divided into routine group and intervention group by random number table method, with 44 cases in each group. Routine nursing was carried out in the routine group, and systematic nursing intervention based on the best evidence was carried out in the intervention group. According to PIPOST model to determine relevant evidence-based nursing intervention and the retrieval strategy, establish the team, retrieval platform of clinical practice guidelines related database both at home and abroad, extraction in the chest cavity closed drainage tube nursing, psychological counseling, emergency treatment, functional exercise, professional training and health education, etc, the best evidence, form the system of nursing intervention. The two groups were compared in terms of drainage time, daily drainage volume, average length of hospital stay, complications, physiological function, pain sensation, psychological state and social function scores before and after nursing. Results The average daily discharge and average length of hospitalization in the intervention group were less than those in the routine group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of complications after pleural effusion drainage in the intervention group was lower than that in the routine group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The scores of quality of life after nursing in the intervention group were higher than those in the routine group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion Based on the best evidence, the systematic nursing intervention of closed thoracic drainage for patients with pleural effusion can reduce the incidence of complications after drainage, relieve patients' bad mood, improve the quality of life, and improve the prognosis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-08
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭