紫杉醇联合奈达铂腹腔热灌注治疗 消化道恶性肿瘤的应用价值分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

姚刚,男,主治医师,主要研究方向是肿瘤内科治疗。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 735

基金项目:


Analysis of the Application Value of Paclitaxel Combined with Nedaplatin Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Perfusion in the Treatment of Digestive Tract Malignant Tumor
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要目的:研究紫杉醇联合奈达铂腹腔热灌注治疗消化道恶性肿瘤的应用价值。 方法:选取瑞昌市人民医院 2015 年 4 月至 2021 年 4 月期间收治的 62 例消化道恶性肿瘤患者,根据其化疗途径不同分为热灌注组及静脉给药组,各 31 例。两组 均为紫杉醇联合奈达铂给药,热灌注组采用腹腔热灌注方式完成化疗,静脉给药组通过静脉滴注方式完成化疗;比较两组 肿瘤治疗效果,比较两组治疗前后肿瘤标志物水平〔糖类抗原 19–9(CA19–9)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经元特异性烯醇 化酶(NSE)〕,对患者存在恶心、脱发、神经毒性、肝肾损伤、骨髓抑制等情况进行记录并比较。 结果:热灌注组患者 的客观缓解率(ORR)为 83.87 %,高于静脉给药组的 61.29 %,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后两组患者的 CA19–9、CEA、NSE 均有不同程度下降,且热灌注组低于静脉给药组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。热灌注组不良 反应发生率为 51.61 %,与静脉给药组的 64.51 % 比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论:紫杉醇联合奈达铂腹腔热 灌注治疗消化道恶性肿瘤具有较高价值。

    Abstract:

    AbstractObjective To study the application value of paclitaxel combined with nedaplatin intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion in the treatment of digestive tract malignant tumor. Methods 62 patients with digestive tract malignant tumor admitted to Ruichang People's Hospital from April 2015 to April 2021 were divided into hot perfusion group and intravenous administration group, with 31 cases in each group. Both groups were given paclitaxel combined with nedaplatin. The hot perfusion group used intraperitoneal hot perfusion to complete chemotherapy, while the intravenous administration group used intravenous drip to complete chemotherapy. The curative effect of tumor between the two groups was compared, The levels of tumor markers [carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19–9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE)] were compared before and after treatment, and the patients' nausea, alopecia, neurotoxicity, liver and kidney injury, bone marrow suppression and so on were recorded and compared. Results The objective remission rate (ORR) of patients in the hot perfusion group was 83.87%, which was higher than 61.29% in the intravenous administration group, and the difference were statistically significant (P < 0.05). After treatment, CA19–9, CEA and NSE of patients in the two groups all decreased in different degrees, these indexes in the hot perfusion group were lower than those in the intravenous administration group and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in hot perfusion group was 51.61%, which was not statistically significant compared with 64.51% in intravenous administration group (P > 0.05). Conclusion Paclitaxel combined with nedaplatin intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion is of high value in the treatment of digestive tract malignant tumors.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-09
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-07-26
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭