经皮神经肌肉电刺激治疗周围神经损伤的临床研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

施晓耕,女,副主任医师,主要从事神经内科工作。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 722.14+ 4

基金项目:


Clinical Study of Percutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injury
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要目的:研究经皮神经肌肉电刺激治疗周围神经损伤的临床疗效。 方法:选取广州市第一人民医院在 2020 年 1 月 至 2021 年 5 月期间收治的 62 例周围神经损伤患者,用随机数字表法的原则分为对照与观察组,各 31 例。对照组采用常规 治疗,观察组在对照组的基础上给予经皮神经肌肉电刺激治疗,比较两种治疗方法的临床疗效。 结果:观察组患者治疗总 有效率为 93.55 %,高于对照组的 74.19 %,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗前两组患者的正中神经、尺神经、桡 神经的神经肌电图指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);治疗后两组患者的运动神经传导速度和波幅均大于治疗前, 运动电位潜伏期均短于治疗前,且观察组患者的运动神经传导速度和波幅均大于对照组,运动电位潜伏期均短于对照组, 差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论:采用经皮神经肌肉电刺激治疗周围神经损伤的总体效果显著。

    Abstract:

    AbstractObjective To study the clinical effect of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of peripheral nerve injury. Methods A total of 62 patients with peripheral nerve injury who were admitted to Guangzhou First People's Hospital from January 2020 to May 2021 were selected and divided into control group and observation group according to the principle of random number table, with 31 cases in each group. The control group was given routine treatment, and the observation group was given transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the basis of the control group, and the clinical efficacy of the two treatment methods was compared. Results The total effective rate in the observation group was 93.55%, which was higher than 74.19% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in electromyography indexes of median nerve, ulnar nerve and radial nerve between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). After treatment, the motor nerve conduction velocity and amplitude of patients in the two groups were higher than those before treatment, and the motor potential latency was shorter than that before treatment, and the motor nerve conduction velocity and amplitude of patients in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the motor potential latency was shorter than that in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion The overall effect of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury is significant.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-07-14
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭