舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼对急诊脑外伤手术麻醉效果比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第 990 医院,河南 驻马店 463000)

作者简介:

李祯,女,主治医师,主要研究方向是麻醉相关。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 614

基金项目:


Comparison of the Effect of Sufentanil and Remifentanil on Anesthesia in Emergency Brain Trauma Surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

(The 990th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Henan Zhumadian 463000)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    〔摘 要〕 目的: 比较舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼在急诊脑外伤手术麻醉中的应用效果。方法: 选取 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月 解放军联勤保障部队第 990 医院急诊科收治的脑外伤患者 80 例,按照随机数字表法,分为对照组和观察组,各 40 例。对照 组应用瑞芬太尼麻醉,观察组应用舒芬太尼麻醉,比较两组患者麻醉诱导前(T0)、插管时(T1)、手术开始时(T2)、拔 管时(T3)的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)水平,同时对两组患者麻醉维持时间、气管插管拔管时间、苏醒时间以及 不良反应发生率进行比较。结果: 观察组患者T1、T2、T3的MAP、HR水平均较对照组平稳,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05); 观察组患者麻醉维持时间长于对照组,气管插管拔管时间、苏醒时间短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);观 察组患者不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论: 急诊脑外伤手术麻醉中舒芬太尼的应用 效果优于瑞芬太尼,不良反应少,安全性高。

    Abstract:

    〔Abstract〕Objective To compare the effect of Sufentanil and Remifentanil in emergency operation of traumatic brain injury. Method From January 2017 to December 2018, 80 patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to the emergency department of the 990th Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support Force were divided into control group (40 cases) and observation group (40 cases). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) before anesthesia induction (T0) , during intubation (T1) , at the beginning of operation (T2) and during extubation (T3) were compared between the control group and the observation group, the duration of anesthesia, extubation time, recovery time and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The MAP and HR levels of T1, T2 and T3 in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05) , the duration of anesthesia in the observation group was longer than that in the control group, and the time of extubation and recovery in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, the differences were all statistically significant (P < 0.05) , and the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Sufentanil is more effective than Remifentanil in emergency operation of brain trauma with less side effects and higher safety

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-11
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-04-18
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭