POCT 血糖仪与全自动生化分析仪血糖检测结果比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(江门市新会区人民医院,广东 江门 529100)

作者简介:

谭柏松,男,副主任检验技师,主要从事检验科工作。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 587.1

基金项目:

江门市医疗卫生领域科技计划项目资助课题(2018020400210002088)


Comparison and Analysis of Blood Glucose Test Results Between POCT Blood Glucose Meter and Automatic Biochemical Analyzer
Author:
Affiliation:

(Jiangmen Xinhui District People's Hospital, Guangdong Jiangmen 529100)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    〔摘 要〕 目的:比较血糖检测中即时检验(POCT)血糖仪与全自动生化分析仪的临床应用效果。方法:选取江门市新 会区人民医院 2018 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月期间收治的 100 例糖尿病患者及健康体检者,获得不同葡萄糖浓度的静脉全血样本, 4 例≤ 2.8 mmol·L-1 纳入 1 组;16 例介于 2.8 ~ < 4.2 mmol·L-1 纳入 2 组;20 例介于 4.2 ~ < 6.7 mmol·L-1 纳入 3 组; 30 例介于 6.7 ~ < 11.1 mmol·L-1 纳入 4 组;14 例介于 11.1 ~ < 16.6 mmol·L-1 纳入 5 组;8 例介于 16.6 ~ 22.2 mmol·L-1 纳入 6 组;8 例> 22.2 mmol·L-1 纳入 7 组。通过 42 台 POCT 血糖仪与全自动生化分析仪对各组血糖进行检测,比较 分析两种仪器的检测效果。结果:经检测结果显示,各组 POCT 血糖仪检测结果与全自动生化分析仪检测结果比较,差 异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。线性回归分析显示,4 组和 5 组相关系数 r 值最高,r 值 0.997 ~ 0.999,线性回归方程 y = 1.0075x + 0.1752。所有检测结果均与《便携式葡萄糖仪血液葡萄糖测定指南》中相关判定标准相符合,比对全自动生 化分析仪,42 台 POCT 血糖仪的检测结果均在允许范围之内,即参与比对的 POCT 血糖仪均合格。结论:在血糖检测中, POCT 血糖仪与全自动化生化分析仪检结果无显著差异,而且 POCT 血糖仪操作简单,具备良好的稳定性以及重复性。

    Abstract:

    〔Abstract〕 Objective To compare the clinical effect of point–of–care testing (POCT) and automatic biochemical analyzer in blood glucose detection. Methods A total of 100 diabetic patients and healthy subjects admitted to Jiangmen Xinhui District People's Hospital from March 2018 to March 2020 were selected. Venous whole blood samples with different glucose concentrations were obtained, and 4 patients ≤ 2.8 mmol·L-1 were included in group 1. Sixteen patients with the range of 2.8 ~ < 4.2 mmol·L-1 were included in group 2. Twenty patients with the range of 4.2 ~ < 6.7 mmol·L-1 were included in group 3. Thirty patients ranging from 6.7 to 11.1 mmol·L-1 were included in group 4. 14 ranged from 11.1 to 16.6 mmol·L-1 and were included in group 5; Eight patients with the range of 16.6 ~ 22.2 mmol·L-1 were included in group 6. Eight patients > 22.2 mmol·L-1 were included in group 7. 42 POCT glucose meters and automatic biochemical analyzer were used to detect blood glucose in each group, and the detection effects of the two instruments were compared and analyzed. Results The test results showed that there was no significant difference between the test resultsof POCT and automatic biochemical analyzer in each group (P > 0.05). The linear regression analysis showed that the correlation coefficient r value of group 4 and group 5 was the highest, r value was 0.999 ~ 0.997, and the linear regression equation was y = 1.0075x + 0.1752. All the test resultswere consistent with the relevant criteria in “The Guideline for Blood Glucose Measurement by Portable Glucose Meter”. The results of the automatic biochemical analyzer and 42 POCT glucose meters were all within the permitted range, that is, all the glucose meters involved in the comparison were qualified. Conclusion In blood glucose detection, POCT blood glucose meter has no significant difference with fully automated biochemical analyzer. POCT blood glucose meter has simple operation, good stability and repeatability.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-16
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-04-18
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭