小切口阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 郑州市惠济区古荥镇卫生院,河南 郑州 450043;2. 郑州市惠济区第二人民医院,河南 郑州 450043)

作者简介:

王江华,男,副主任医师,主要从事普外科工作。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 656.8

基金项目:


Clinical Effect of Small Incision Appendectomy in the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Zhengzhou Huiji District Guying Town Health Center, Henan Zhengzhou 450043; 2. Zhengzhou Huiji District Second People's Hospital, Henan Zhengzhou 450043)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    〔摘 要〕 目的:观察小切口阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效。方法:选取郑州市惠济区古荥镇卫生院 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 10 月收治的 66 例急性阑尾炎患者为研究对象,按照双色球随机分组法将患者分为对照组(33 例,传统阑 尾切除术)与观察组(33 例,小切口阑尾切除术),比较两组患者治疗效果。结果:观察组患者术后 72 h 相关炎症因子水 平均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组患者术后首次排气时间、术后首次排便时间早于对照组,平 均住院时间短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组患者术后并发症发生率(3.03 %)低于对照组(21.21 %), 差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:急性阑尾炎患者应用小切口阑尾切除术治疗效果明显优于传统阑尾切除术。

    Abstract:

    〔Abstract〕 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of small incision appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Methods 66 patients with acute appendicitis admitted to the Guxing Town Health Center in Huiji District, Zhengzhou City from October 2018 to October 2019 were selected as the research subjects. According to the two-color ball randomized grouping method. The patients were divided into a control group (33 cases: traditional appendectomy) and an observation group (33 cases: small incision appendectomy) to compare the treatment effects of the two groups. Results The levels of related inflammatory factors in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 72 h after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The observation group's first exhaust time and postoperative first defecation time were earlier than those of the control group, and the average hospital stay was shorter than that of the control group. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group (3.03%) was lower than that in the control group (21.21%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effect of small incision appendectomy for patients with acute appendicitis is significantly better than that of traditional appendectomy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-19
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-12-06
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭