柴胡疏肝散联合抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的有效性和安全性: 系统评价和 Meta 分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

孙珂焕,女,助理研究员,主要从事老年医学研究。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R 749.4+ 1

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目资助课题(81574038);广东省自然科学基金项目资助课题(2018A0303130158); 深圳市科技计划项目资助课题(JCYJ20180508152437368,JCYJ20170413161352000)


The Effi cacy and Safety of The Combination Of Chaihu-Shugan-San and Antidepressants on Depression: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要目的:评价柴胡疏肝散(CSS)联合抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的有效性和安全性。 方法:检索中国期刊全文数据库 (CNKI)、万方数据(Wanfang Database)、维普中国科技期刊数据库(VIP)、PubMed、Medline 和 Cochrane Library。 搜集有关 CSS 联合抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的随机对照试验(RCT),应用 RevMan 5.2 和 STATA 11.0 软件对数据进行分析。 结果:本研究共纳入 8 个随机对照试验(RCT),共 632 例患者。CSS 联合抗抑郁药组的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评 分与抗抑郁药单药组比较,差异具有统计学意义,比值比(OR)= –2.86,95 % 置信区间(CI)〔–5.23,–0.48〕,P = 0.02; CSS 联合抗抑郁药组优于抗抑郁药单药组。CSS 联合抗抑郁药组与抗抑郁药单药组的疗效比较,差异具有统计学意义, OR = 2.96,95 % CI〔1.69,5.18〕,P = 0.0001,CSS 联合抗抑郁药组优于抗抑郁药单药组。CSS 联合抗抑郁药组与抗抑 郁药单药组的治疗时出现的症状量表(TESS)评分比较,差异具有统计学意义,OR = –0.65,95 % CI〔–1.02,–0.28〕, P = 0.0006,CSS 联合抗抑郁药组低于抗抑郁药单药组。 结论:CSS 联合抗抑郁药具有较好的疗效和安全性,但应扩大样本量, 进行前瞻性 RCT 研究,进一步证实本研究结论。

    Abstract:

    AbstractObjective To evaluate the effi cacy and safety of the combination of Chaihu-Shugan-San (CSS) and antidepressants on depression. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of the combination of CSS and antidepressants versus antidepressants alone for the treatment of depression were retrieved by searching the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, the Wanfang database, VIP, PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Library. Data analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.2 and STATA 11.0. Results Eight RCTs including 562 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. The results revealed signifi cant differences in the HAMD score (OR = -2.86, 95 % CI: -5.23 ~ -0.48, P = 0.02), which suggested the effects in the CSS plus antidepressant group were better than that in the antidepressant alone group. The results revealed signifi cant differences in the therapeutic effects (OR = 2.96, 95 % CI: 1.69 ~ 5.18, P = 0.0001), which suggested the effects in the CSS plus antidepressant group were better than that in the antidepressant alone group. The results revealed signifi cant differences in the TESS score (OR = -0.65, 95 % CI: -1.02 ~ -0.28, P = 0.0006), and the TESS score in the CSS plus antidepressant group was lower than that in the antidepressant alone group. Conclusion CSS combined with antidepressants are more effective and safety compared with antidepressants alone in the treatment of depression. However, our fi ndings should be further verifi ed based on a larger sample size and prospective randomized controlled trial.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-14
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-12-14
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
特别声明

近期有不法分子冒充我刊名义给作者打电话或发邮件,编造各种理由要求添加微信或QQ、伪造复制我刊编辑部公章发放假冒录用通知书等等各种方式试图骗取作者钱财。为强化编辑部工作规范,加强单位公章管理,维护作者的正当权益和财产利益, 我刊在此郑重声明:(1)编辑部与作者沟通方式为电话和邮件,在本刊唯一官方网站(http:/szzxyjhzz.szrch.com)“联系我们”下拉菜单,或者网站最下端信息栏可以查询),绝对不会要求作者添加微信或QQ。 (2)自2025年2月1日起,注销废除“深圳中西医结合杂志编辑部”电子公章;我刊稿件录用通知调整为加盖编辑部实体公章的纸质文件或其扫描件,录用稿件仅收取合理版面制作费和审稿费,收款单位为“深圳市第二人民医院”对公账户,其他加盖电子公章或涉及私人账户者均为伪造假冒。望广大作者提高警惕,谨防上当受骗。 《深圳中西医结合杂志》编辑部

关闭